Martin Luther neostal pri svojom prvotnom postoji k J\u00e1novi Husovi, ktor\u00fd zaujal v u\u017e spom\u00ednanej Lipskej di\u0161pute 1520, ke\u010f povedal: my v\u0161etci sme husiti\u2026<\/i>\u010cesk\u00fd historik Amedeo Moln\u00e1r v tom v\u00fdroku vid\u00ed viac z\u00e1sluhu katol\u00edckych odporcov ako samotn\u00e9ho Luthera. \u00a0N\u00e1\u0161 reform\u00e1tor n\u00e1m v\u0161ak zanechal aj mnoh\u00e9 in\u00e9 jasn\u00e9 svedectv\u00e1. Ke\u010f kapl\u00e1n Emser na di\u0161pute vyzdvihoval Aristotela a Luthera obvi\u0148oval z husitizmu, Luther reagoval pr\u00edzna\u010dne. V odpovedi \u201cCapovi v Lipsku Emserovi\u201d\u00a0<\/i>hovor\u00ed: \u201dHoci Emser vyzdvihuje Aristotela a m\u0148a nap\u00e1da v mene Husa a Jeron\u00fdma, chcem rad\u0161ej ma\u0165 Husovu hanbu ne\u017e Aristotelovu \u010des\u0165\u201d. \u00a0\u00a0<\/i>
Nesk\u00f4r, ke\u010f si Luther pre\u010d\u00edtal knihu O cirkvi<\/b>, ktor\u00fa dostal od pra\u017esk\u00fdch husitov, zaujala ho nato\u013eko, \u017ee ju odporu\u010dil \u010d\u00edta\u0165 aj priate\u013eovi Spalatinovi.\u00a0S\u00e1m o nej nap\u00edsal: \u201dJe to kniha, akej za 400 rokov nikto nenap\u00edsal, ktor\u00e1 sa dostala do tla\u010de Bo\u017e\u00edm veden\u00edm, aby dosved\u010dila pravdu a verejne zahanbila v\u0161etk\u00fdch, ktor\u00fd ju zavrhuj\u00fa\u201d<\/i>. Luther Husovu u\u010denos\u0165 \u00faprimne obdivoval a nap\u00edsal o \u0148om aj tak\u00e9to slov\u00e1: \u201dHus bol ve\u013emi u\u010den\u00fd a nebol nik\u00fdm usved\u010den\u00fd z nepravdy\u201d. <\/i>Jeho obdiv <\/i>k J. Husovi st\u00e1le r\u00e1stol aj preto, \u017ee si nesk\u00f4r podrobne pre\u0161tudoval aj dejiny kostnick\u00e9ho koncilu. Majstra J\u00e1na oce\u0148oval nielen pre jeho vzdelanos\u0165, ale najm\u00e4 za kritiku odpustkov, simonie, r\u00f4znych neporiadkov v cirkvi a p\u00e1pe\u017estva. Pova\u017eoval za obdivuhodn\u00e9, \u017ee sa postavil s\u00e1m proti v\u0161etk\u00fdm vtedaj\u0161\u00edm autorit\u00e1m sveta, najm\u00e4 proti p\u00e1pe\u017eovi a cis\u00e1rovi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
V k\u00e1zni v druh\u00fa nede\u013eu po Ve\u013ekej noci otvorene sved\u010dil: \u201dJ\u00e1n Hus bol na pekelnom kostnickom koncile preto diablom prekri\u010dan\u00fd a ods\u00faden\u00fd, lebo karhal p\u00e1pe\u017ea a jeho dvor pre ich zl\u00fd hanebn\u00fd \u017eivot. Ani svoje vlastn\u00e9 nariadenia nie v\u017edy zachov\u00e1vali\u201d.<\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 <\/i>Osobitn\u00e9 svedectvo o postoji n\u00e1\u0161ho reform\u00e1tora prin\u00e1\u0161a aj kremnick\u00fd far\u00e1r Konr\u00e1d Cordatus<\/b> vo svojich z\u00e1pisoch Lutherov\u00fdch Re\u010d\u00ed pri stole. Ke\u010f Cordatus vyjadril mienku, \u017ee Luther predsa len vykonal na poli reform\u00e1cie cirkvi viac ako J. Hus, Luther s obdivom dodal: \u201dV Husovej dobe bol p\u00e1pe\u017e v najv\u00e4\u010d\u0161ej \u00facte a pri najv\u00e4\u010d\u0161ej moci. Ale skrze Husa sa stalo, \u017ee pomaly po \u0148om v\u017edy viacej upadal. Okrem toho po J\u00e1novi pri\u0161lo nieko\u013eko dobr\u00fdch mu\u017eov, ktor\u00ed p\u00e1pe\u017eovi protire\u010dili, ale pred J\u00e1nom nebol nikto tak\u00fd\u201d.\u00a0<\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0\u00a0<\/i> \u00a0 U Luthera teda vid\u00edme jasn\u00fd nadh\u013ead, \u00factu a obdiv k u\u010denosti, mravnosti, k odvahe viery a kres\u0165anskej vernosti u majstra J\u00e1na. A dok\u00e1zal poveda\u0165 e\u0161te viac. <\/i>V roku 1538 v k\u00e1zni (na text J\u00e1n 16) Luther sved\u010dil: \u201dV Kostnici bol up\u00e1len\u00fd sv\u00e4t\u00fd J\u00e1n Hus\u2026\u201d! <\/i>\u00c1no, po\u010dujeme dobre. Luther hovor\u00ed o J\u00e1novi ako o sv\u00e4tom mu\u017eovi! Vo v\u00fdklade knihy Izai\u00e1\u0161a nap\u00edsal: \u201cJ\u00e1n Hus a in\u00ed sv\u00e4t\u00ed zomreli ako mart\u00fdri\u201d. 21. \u010dl\u00e1nok A.V. o uctievan\u00ed sv\u00e4t\u00fdch plat\u00ed aj o J\u00e1novi Husovi a pr\u00e1vom sa aj v na\u0161ej cirkvi 5. j\u00fala dodnes pripom\u00edna.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Martin Luther neostal pri svojom prvotnom postoji k J\u00e1novi Husovi, ktor\u00fd zaujal v u\u017e spom\u00ednanej Lipskej di\u0161pute 1520, ke\u010f povedal: my v\u0161etci sme husiti\u2026\u010cesk\u00fd historik Amedeo Moln\u00e1r v tom v\u00fdroku vid\u00ed viac z\u00e1sluhu katol\u00edckych odporcov ako samotn\u00e9ho Luthera. \u00a0N\u00e1\u0161 reform\u00e1tor n\u00e1m v\u0161ak zanechal aj mnoh\u00e9 in\u00e9 jasn\u00e9 svedectv\u00e1. Ke\u010f kapl\u00e1n Emser na di\u0161pute vyzdvihoval Aristotela … \u010c\u00edta\u0165 viac<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[40],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29962","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-historia"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29962","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29962"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29962\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38478,"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29962\/revisions\/38478"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29962"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29962"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29962"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}