Slovo P\u00e1na, svetlo moje,
prevz\u00e1cny m\u00f4j poklad je.
Ty ma u\u010d\u00ed\u0161 cest\u00e1m svojim,
vrav\u00ed\u0161 mi, komu patr\u00edm.
Bu\u010f na\u010falej n\u00e1dejou mojou,
ako si v\u017edy bolo mojou \u00fatechou,
skr\u00fd\u0161ou a hradom, \u00f3 Kniha kn\u00edh,
a\u017e pr\u00eddem radosti v nebesiach.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Kres\u0165ania uzn\u00e1vaj\u00fa autoritu sv\u00e4t\u00e9ho P\u00edsma. \u00daplne neomyln\u00e9 a preto d\u00f4veryhodn\u00e9 je len sv\u00e4t\u00e9 P\u00edsmo. Nikdy sa nem\u00fdli, i ke\u010f sa m\u00f4\u017ee sta\u0165, \u017ee je nespr\u00e1vne vylo\u017een\u00e9. V Biblii, t. j. v Bo\u017eom Slove, sa zjavuje Boh. Nepotrebuje \u013eudsk\u00e9 dopl\u0148ovanie a nem\u00e1 sa z neho ani ni\u010d ubera\u0165. \u201eChcem, aby P\u00edsmo samo bolo kr\u00e1\u013eovnou.\u201c<\/em> M. Luther<\/p>\n\n\n\n Pokoj V\u00e1m!!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Slovo P\u00e1na, svetlo moje,prevz\u00e1cny m\u00f4j poklad je.Ty ma u\u010d\u00ed\u0161 cest\u00e1m svojim,vrav\u00ed\u0161 mi, komu patr\u00edm.Bu\u010f na\u010falej n\u00e1dejou mojou,ako si v\u017edy bolo mojou \u00fatechou,skr\u00fd\u0161ou a hradom, \u00f3 Kniha kn\u00edh,a\u017e pr\u00eddem radosti v nebesiach. \u201eAk je to pravda, ako \u017ee to nem\u00f4\u017ee by\u0165 lo\u017e, mus\u00ed by\u0165 pravdou aj to, \u017ee okrem Bo\u017eieho slova v\u0161etko \u013eudsk\u00e9 u\u010denie a m\u00fadros\u0165, nech … \u010c\u00edta\u0165 viac<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35674","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-pamiatka-reformacie"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35674","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35674"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35674\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35681,"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35674\/revisions\/35681"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35674"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35674"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35674"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\u201eAk je to pravda, ako \u017ee to nem\u00f4\u017ee by\u0165 lo\u017e, mus\u00ed by\u0165 pravdou aj to, \u017ee okrem Bo\u017eieho slova v\u0161etko \u013eudsk\u00e9 u\u010denie a m\u00fadros\u0165, nech by \u017eiarili a leskli sa kr\u00e1sne a n\u00e1dherne ako len dok\u00e1\u017eu, s\u00fa \u010d\u00edrou temnotou. Aj rozum je ur\u010dit\u00fdm kr\u00e1snym svetlom, ale cestu a smer, ktor\u00e9 by viedli z hriechov a smrti k spravodlivosti a \u017eivotu, uk\u00e1za\u0165 nedok\u00e1\u017ee, ani na \u0148u privies\u0165, len zost\u00e1va v temnote. Ako na\u0161e lampy neosvet\u013euj\u00fa nebo a zem, le\u017e iba mali\u010dk\u00fa \u010das\u0165 domu, slnko v\u0161ak nebes\u00e1, zem a v\u0161etko osvet\u013euje, tak je aj Bo\u017eie slovo t\u00fdm prav\u00fdm Slnkom, ktor\u00e9 n\u00e1m d\u00e1va \u017ei\u0165 ve\u010dn\u00fd de\u0148 a radova\u0165 sa. Kto ho m\u00e1 r\u00e1d, te\u0161\u00ed sa mu a Svetlo miluje, lebo pr\u00edjemne blik\u00e1. Ale krty a netopiere ho neob\u013eubuj\u00fa \u2013 to je svet.\u201c<\/em> Dr. Martin Luther<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Princ\u00edp iba autority a v\u00fdnimo\u010dn\u00e9ho v\u00fdznamu P\u00edsma sv\u00e4t\u00e9ho naz\u00fdvame od d\u00f4b reform\u00e1cie sola scriptura (jedine P\u00edsmo). Znamen\u00e1 to, \u017ee Biblia je vo v\u0161etk\u00fdch ot\u00e1zkach t\u00fdkaj\u00facich sa viery a mor\u00e1lky, teda \u017eivota s Bohom, kres\u0165ansk\u00fdch doktr\u00edn a etiky, \u00faplne dostato\u010dn\u00e1. Teologick\u00e9 syst\u00e9my, ktor\u00e9 s\u00fa v rozpore s biblick\u00fdm kres\u0165anstvom sa stavaj\u00fa proti z\u00e1sade sola scriptura, preto\u017ee kv\u00f4li nej str\u00e1caj\u00fa mo\u017enos\u0165 \u010doko\u013evek k P\u00edsmu sv\u00e4t\u00e9mu prida\u0165 alebo mu prida\u0165 svoju zvl\u00e1\u0161tnu, svojsk\u00fa interpret\u00e1ciu. Je pravdou, \u017ee pochopenie sola scriptura v P\u00edsme nevystupuje, ale podobn\u00e9 je to aj s po\u0148at\u00edm Trojice. Pre P\u00e1na Je\u017ei\u0161a v\u0161ak P\u00edsmo sv\u00e4t\u00e9 predstavovalo najvy\u0161\u0161iu autoritu v Jeho osobnom \u017eivote aj v Jeho slu\u017ebe. \u010casto sa odvol\u00e1val na P\u00edsma a nie na nejak\u00fa trad\u00edciu. Ke\u010f sa vracal k Bo\u017eiemu Slovu, v\u017edy sa jednalo o zap\u00edsan\u00e9 P\u00edsmo. V Jeho pr\u00edpade to bol Star\u00fd z\u00e1kon. Na z\u00e1klade Je\u017ei\u0161ovho u\u010deniu do\u0161li kres\u0165ania k z\u00e1veru, \u017ee sa P\u00edsmo sv\u00e4t\u00e9 mus\u00ed sta\u0165 kone\u010dnou in\u0161tanciou k posudzovaniu v\u0161etk\u00fdch \u013eudsk\u00fdch v\u00fdrokov. P\u00e1n Je\u017ei\u0161 v podstate o trad\u00edcii, teda o tzv. \u00fastnom podan\u00ed, nehovoril pozit\u00edvne (Mt 15,2\u22129; 22,29\u221232; Mk 7,1\u221213). Za najvy\u0161\u0161iu a v\u00fdlu\u010dn\u00fa autoritu pova\u017eoval P\u00edsmo, Jeho stanovisko prijali biblicky veriaci kres\u0165ania a ber\u00fa P\u00edsmo sv\u00e4t\u00e9 v\u00e1\u017ene. Nem\u00f4\u017eu ani akceptova\u0165 ved\u013ea Biblie ak\u00e9ko\u013evek in\u00e9 spisy, zjavenia, trad\u00edciu alebo u\u010denie, ktor\u00e9 by si n\u00e1rokovali na jej postavenie a \u00farove\u0148. Objavuj\u00fa sa n\u00e1mietky, \u017ee princ\u00edp sola scriptura je zbaven\u00fd historick\u00fdch kore\u0148ov, to znamen\u00e1, \u017ee je vlastne len s\u00fa\u010dasn\u00fdm pr\u00edstupom k P\u00edsmu sv\u00e4t\u00e9mu. Dejiny cirkvi v\u0161ak dokazuj\u00fa, \u017ee t\u00e1to z\u00e1sada bola v\u017edy zn\u00e1ma a re\u0161pektovan\u00e1. Z\u00e1sada sola scriptura sa v cirkvi v\u0161eobecne vyu\u010dovala.
Pokia\u013e ide o Bo\u017eie a sv\u00e4t\u00e9 tajomstv\u00e1 viery nie s\u00fa n\u00e1m dovolen\u00e9 ani tie najmen\u0161ie \u00favahy bez P\u00edsma sv\u00e4t\u00e9ho, ani sa riadi\u0165 ak\u00fdmiko\u013evek pravdepodobnos\u0165ami \u010di obratnou argument\u00e1ciou. Na t\u00fdchto \u010dl\u00e1nkoch staviame cel\u00fa doktr\u00ednu viery. Preto\u017ee \u010dl\u00e1nky viery neboli ustanoven\u00e9, aby sa zap\u00e1\u010dili \u013eu\u010fom, ale predstavuj\u00fa najd\u00f4le\u017eitej\u0161ie body vybran\u00e9 z cel\u00e9ho P\u00edsma, vytv\u00e1raj\u00face jednoliate u\u010denie viery. Viera v sebe zahr\u0148uje cel\u00e9 poznanie zbo\u017enosti obsiahnut\u00e9 v Starom aj v Novom z\u00e1kone. D\u00e1vajme preto pozor a dr\u017eme sa poslania (2Tes 2,15), ktor\u00e9 dost\u00e1vame a nap\u00ed\u0161me ich na tabu\u013eky svojich s\u0155dc. Preto mus\u00ed by\u0165 v\u0161etko podlo\u017een\u00e9 P\u00edsmom sv\u00e4t\u00fdm. Autorita u\u010dite\u013ea vych\u00e1dza z autority P\u00edsma sv\u00e4t\u00e9ho. \u017diadne u\u010denie, pokia\u013e nem\u00e1 svoj zdroj v P\u00edsme sv\u00e4tom, nem\u00f4\u017ee by\u0165 prijat\u00e9. Cirkev m\u00e1 samozrejme autoritu, ale t\u00e1 autorita sa nezaklad\u00e1 na nejakom historickom n\u00e1stupnickom pr\u00e1ve, ale na vernosti P\u00edsmu sv\u00e4t\u00e9mu. Cirkev podlieha vy\u0161\u0161ej nadradenej autorite P\u00edsma sv\u00e4t\u00e9ho. Z\u00e1sada sola scriptura teda nie je novovekou doktr\u00ednou, ale vyjadruje presved\u010denie na\u010derpan\u00e9 z P\u00edsiem sv\u00e4t\u00fdch a vyzn\u00e1van\u00e9 cirkvou prv\u00fdch storo\u010d\u00ed. Tak\u017ee tento princ\u00edp m\u00e1 z\u00e1rove\u0148 biblick\u00fd i historick\u00fd prame\u0148. Odporcovia z\u00e1sady sola scriptura sa sna\u017eia pov\u00fd\u0161i\u0165 na \u00farove\u0148 zjavenia \u00fastnu trad\u00edciu. Tak\u00fdto pr\u00edstup je vo v\u00fdraznom nes\u00falade so sam\u00fdm P\u00edsmom, a tie\u017e aj vierohodn\u00fdmi historick\u00fdmi predpokladmi. Ke\u010f cirkevn\u00ed otcovia hovoria o trad\u00edci\u00ed, potom to v\u0165ahuj\u00fa na cirkevn\u00e9 oby\u010daje a obrady, nikdy nie na doktr\u00ednu. Tak\u00e1to trad\u00edcia sa v\u017edy musela podriadi\u0165 P\u00edsmu sv\u00e4t\u00e9mu. To nikde neu\u010dia, \u017ee by trad\u00edcia bola tie\u017e vd\u00fdchnut\u00e1 (in\u0161pirovan\u00e1) Duchom. Sk\u00f4r je to naopak, P\u00edsmo sv\u00e4t\u00e9 obsahuje ve\u013ek\u00e9 varovanie pred trad\u00edciou.
Reform\u00e1tori zavrhli my\u0161lienku \u00fastnej trad\u00edcie nez\u00e1vislej na P\u00edsme sv\u00e4tom ako gnostick\u00fa her\u00e9zu. Apo\u0161tolsk\u00fd odkaz, teda cel\u00e9 n\u00e1m potrebn\u00e9 u\u010denie obsiahnut\u00e9 v P\u00edsme sv\u00e4tom a je v \u0148om vylo\u017een\u00e9 tak, aby sme ho boli schopn\u00ed re\u0161pektova\u0165 a praktizova\u0165. To, \u010do apo\u0161tolovia u\u010dili \u00fastne, nesk\u00f4r zap\u00edsali vo forme Nov\u00e9ho z\u00e1kona. Ireneus to vyjadril takto: \u201eOd nikoho in\u00e9ho sme sa o pl\u00e1ne n\u00e1\u0161ho spasenia nedozvedeli viac ne\u017e od t\u00fdch, skrze ktor\u00fdch k n\u00e1m dorazilo evanjelium, ktor\u00e9 vo svojej dobe verejne oznamovali, a v neskor\u0161ej dobe n\u00e1m ich, z Bo\u017eej v\u00f4le, odovzdali v P\u00edsmach, aby sa to stalo z\u00e1kladom i st\u013apom na\u0161ej viery.\u201c<\/p>\n\n\n\n