{"id":3789,"date":"2011-09-26T10:49:37","date_gmt":"2011-09-26T10:49:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/e-anjelik.sk\/?p=3789"},"modified":"2011-09-26T10:49:37","modified_gmt":"2011-09-26T10:49:37","slug":"papezove-prihovory-v-nemecku","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/2011\/09\/26\/papezove-prihovory-v-nemecku\/","title":{"rendered":"P\u00e1pe\u017eove pr\u00edhovory v Nemecku"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;Hom&iacute;lia po\u010das ekumenickej bohoslu\u017eby v Erfurte je <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/tkkbs.sk\/view.php?cisloclanku=20110923040\">TU<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>\n<meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\" \/>Pr&iacute;hovor Benedikta XVI. po\u010das stretnutia so z&aacute;stupcami Evanjelickej cirkvi:<\/p>\n<p>\n<meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\" \/>V&aacute;\u017een&eacute; d&aacute;my, v&aacute;\u017een&iacute; p&aacute;ni!<\/p>\n<p>Ke\u010f sa teraz uj&iacute;mam slova, chcel by som predov&scaron;etk&yacute;m po\u010fakova\u0165 za t&uacute;to pr&iacute;le\u017eitos\u0165 stretn&uacute;\u0165 sa s vami. Som v\u010fa\u010dn&yacute; osobitne predstaven&eacute;mu Evanjelickej cirkvi Nikolausovi Schneiderovi, ktor&yacute; ma priv&iacute;tal a svojimi mil&yacute;mi slovami ma prijal medzi v&aacute;s. Z&aacute;rove\u0148 by som chcel po\u010fakova\u0165 za ten zvl&aacute;&scaron;tny dar, \u017ee sa na&scaron;e stretnutie m&ocirc;\u017ee odohra\u0165 na tomto historickom mieste.<\/p>\n<p>Ako r&iacute;mskeho biskupa ma nap\u013a\u0148a dojatie, \u017ee sa m&ocirc;\u017eem stretn&uacute;\u0165 s reprezentantmi Rady nemeckej evanjelickej cirkvi v starobylom augustini&aacute;nskom kl&aacute;&scaron;tore v Erfurte. Tu Luther &scaron;tudoval teol&oacute;giu. Tu bol r. 1507 vysv&auml;ten&yacute; za k\u0148aza. Napriek \u017eelaniu svojho otca, nepokra\u010doval v &scaron;t&uacute;di&aacute;ch pr&aacute;va, ale &scaron;tudoval teol&oacute;giu a kr&aacute;\u010dal ku k\u0148azstvu v reholi sv. August&iacute;na. Na tejto ceste neprebiehal od jedn&eacute;ho k druh&eacute;mu. To, \u010do mu ned&aacute;valo pokoj, bola ot&aacute;zka o Bohu, jeho hlbok&eacute; zanietenie a vzpruha jeho \u017eivota a celej jeho cesty. &bdquo;Ako je mo\u017en&yacute; Boh, ktor&yacute; je milosrdn&yacute;?&ldquo; &ndash; t&aacute;to ot&aacute;zka prenikala jeho srdcom a bola na pozad&iacute; v&scaron;etk&yacute;ch jeho teologick&yacute;ch b&aacute;dan&iacute; i ka\u017ed&eacute;ho vn&uacute;torn&eacute;ho boja. Teol&oacute;gia pre neho nebola akademickou z&aacute;le\u017eitos\u0165ou, ale vn&uacute;torn&yacute;m bojom so sebou sam&yacute;m, bojom, v ktorom i&scaron;lo o Boha, bojom s Bohom.<\/p>\n<p>&bdquo;Ako je mo\u017en&yacute; Boh, ktor&yacute; je milosrdn&yacute;?&ldquo; V\u017edy nanovo ma zasahuje fakt, \u017ee pr&aacute;ve t&aacute;to ot&aacute;zka bola hybnou silou celej jeho cesty. Kto dnes, dokonca i medzi kres\u0165anmi, rie&scaron;i nie\u010do podobn&eacute;? \u010co znamen&aacute; ot&aacute;zka o Bohu v na&scaron;om \u017eivote? V na&scaron;om hl&aacute;san&iacute;? Pre v&auml;\u010d&scaron;inu \u013eud&iacute;, i medzi kres\u0165anmi, sa Boh v kone\u010dnom d&ocirc;sledku nezaj&iacute;ma o na&scaron;e hriechy a na&scaron;e \u010dinnosti. Preto\u017ee on predsa vie, \u017ee sme v&scaron;etci iba \u013eudia (telesn&iacute;). Pokia\u013e dnes e&scaron;te ver&iacute;me v Bo\u017e&iacute; s&uacute;d, \u017ee existuje druh&yacute; breh a takmer v&scaron;etci predpoklad&aacute;me, \u017ee Boh v<br \/>\nskuto\u010dnosti mus&iacute; by\u0165 ve\u013ekorys&yacute;, \u017ee nakoniec vo svojom milosrdenstve n&aacute;m odpust&iacute; na&scaron;e mal&eacute; nedostatky. S&uacute; ale na&scaron;e nedostatky skuto\u010dne tak&eacute; mal&eacute;? \u010ci nie je svet ni\u010den&yacute; kv&ocirc;li korupcii ve\u013ek&yacute;ch, ale tie\u017e mal&yacute;ch, ktor&iacute; myslia iba na svoj vlastn&yacute; prospech? Nie je sn&aacute;\u010f devastovan&yacute; mocou drog, ktor&eacute; s&uacute; udr\u017eovan&eacute; na jednej strane t&uacute;\u017ebou po \u017eivote a peniazoch a na druhej strane la\u010dnos\u0165ou po p&ocirc;\u017eitku u t&yacute;ch \u013eud&iacute;, ktor&iacute; im prepadli? Nie je sn&aacute;\u010f svet ohrozen&yacute; narastaj&uacute;cim sklonom k n&aacute;siliu, ktor&eacute; sa nezriedka maskuje zdanlivou religiozitou? Mohli by hlad a chudoba devastova\u0165 do takej miery cel&eacute; oblasti sveta, keby v n&aacute;s Bo\u017eia l&aacute;ska, po\u010d&iacute;naj&uacute;c l&aacute;skou k bl&iacute;\u017enemu a k Bo\u017e&iacute;m tvorom, k \u013eu\u010fom, bola \u017eiv&scaron;ia? V ot&aacute;zkach t&yacute;mto smerom by sa dalo pokra\u010dova\u0165. Nie, zlo nie je gigantom. Nemohlo by by\u0165 tak siln&eacute;, keby sme my kl&aacute;dli Boha skuto\u010dne do stredu svojho \u017eivota. Ot&aacute;zka: Ak&aacute; je Bo\u017eia poz&iacute;cia vo vz\u0165ahu k mne, ako stoj&iacute;m ja pred Bohom? &ndash; t&aacute;to p&aacute;l\u010div&aacute; ot&aacute;zka Martina Luthera by sa mala znovu sta\u0165 &ndash; iste nov&yacute;m sp&ocirc;sobom &ndash; tie\u017e na&scaron;ou ot&aacute;zkou. Mysl&iacute;m, \u017ee toto je prv&yacute; apel, ktor&yacute; by sme mali c&iacute;ti\u0165 pri stretnut&iacute; s Martinom Lutherom.<\/p>\n<p>A potom je d&ocirc;le\u017eit&eacute; toto: Boh, jedin&yacute; Boh, Stvorite\u013e neba a zeme, je nie\u010d&iacute;m in&yacute;m ne\u017e filozofickou hypot&eacute;zou o p&ocirc;vode vesm&iacute;ru. Tento Boh m&aacute; tv&aacute;r a prehovoril ku n&aacute;m. V \u010dloveku, Je\u017ei&scaron;ovi Kristovi, sa stal jedn&yacute;m z n&aacute;s &ndash; prav&yacute; Boh a prav&yacute; \u010dlovek z&aacute;rove\u0148. Lutherovo myslenie, cel&aacute; jeho spiritualita bola &uacute;plne kristocentrick&aacute;: &bdquo;To, \u010do podporuje Kristovu vec&ldquo; bolo pre Luthera hermeneutick&yacute;m krit&eacute;riom, rozhoduj&uacute;cim pre interpret&aacute;ciu Sv&auml;t&eacute;ho P&iacute;sma. To v&scaron;ak predpoklad&aacute;, \u017ee Kristus je stredom na&scaron;ej spirituality a \u017ee l&aacute;ska k nemu, \u017eivot s n&iacute;m orientuje n&aacute;&scaron; \u017eivot.<\/p>\n<p>Mo\u017eno mi teraz poviete: Dobre, ale \u010do m&aacute; toto v&scaron;etko spolo\u010dn&eacute; s na&scaron;ou ekumenickou situ&aacute;ciou? Nie je to v&scaron;etko len pokus ob&iacute;s\u0165 prostredn&iacute;ctvom mnoh&yacute;ch slov probl&eacute;my, v ktor&yacute;ch \u010dak&aacute;me praktick&yacute; pokrok a konkr&eacute;tne v&yacute;sledky? K tomu odpoved&aacute;m: To, \u010do je pre ekumenizmus najnevyhnutej&scaron;ie, je predov&scaron;etk&yacute;m nestrati\u0165 pomaly a nen&aacute;padne pod tlakom sekulariz&aacute;cie ve\u013ek&eacute; veci, ktor&eacute; m&aacute;me spolo\u010dn&eacute;, ktor&eacute; n&aacute;s ako tak&yacute;ch robia kres\u0165anmi a ktor&eacute; zost&aacute;vaj&uacute; ako dar a &uacute;loha. Bolo by chybou koncesn&eacute;ho veku vidie\u0165 len to, \u010do n&aacute;s rozde\u013euje, a nevn&iacute;ma\u0165 z&aacute;sadn&yacute;m sp&ocirc;sobom to, \u010do m&aacute;me spolo\u010dn&eacute; vo ve\u013ek&yacute;ch smerniciach (direkt&iacute;vach) Sv&auml;t&eacute;ho p&iacute;sma a vo vyznaniach viery kres\u0165anstva. Pr&aacute;ve to je ve\u013ek&yacute; pokrok ekumenizmu posledn&yacute;ch desa\u0165ro\u010d&iacute;, \u017ee sme si toti\u017e pov&scaron;imli toto spolo\u010denstvo v spolo\u010dnej modlitbe a speve, v spolo\u010dnom nasaden&iacute; za kres\u0165ansk&yacute; ethos pred svetom, v spolo\u010dnom svedectve o Bohu Je\u017ei&scaron;ovi Kristovi v tomto svete, a \u017ee uzn&aacute;vame toto spolo\u010denstvo za n&aacute;&scaron; nepominute\u013en&yacute; z&aacute;klad.<\/p>\n<p>Nebezpe\u010denstvo, \u017ee by sme o\u0148 mohli pr&iacute;s\u0165, nie je bohu\u017eia\u013e nere&aacute;lne. Tu by som chcel upozorni\u0165 na dva aspekty. V poslednej dobe sa geografia kres\u0165anstva hlboko zmenila a men&iacute; sa i na\u010falej. Cirkvi historick&yacute;ch vyznan&iacute; zost&aacute;vaj&uacute; \u010dasto zm&auml;ten&eacute; pred novou formou kres\u0165anstva, ktor&eacute; sa &scaron;&iacute;ri s ohromn&yacute;m misijn&yacute;m dynamizmom, ktor&eacute;ho formy niekedy vzbudzuj&uacute; obavy. Je to kres\u0165anstvo s chab&yacute;m in&scaron;titucion&aacute;lnym z&aacute;zem&iacute;m, s malou v&aacute;hou racionality a e&scaron;te men&scaron;ou dogmatickou v&aacute;hou, ale tie\u017e m&aacute;lo stabiln&eacute;. Tento celosvetov&yacute; fenom&eacute;n n&aacute;m v&scaron;etk&yacute;m kladie ot&aacute;zku, \u010do pozit&iacute;vne a \u010do negat&iacute;vne n&aacute;m m&aacute; t&aacute;to nov&aacute; forma kres\u0165anstva poveda\u0165? V ka\u017edom pr&iacute;pade n&aacute;s znovu stavia pred ot&aacute;zku, \u010do zost&aacute;va v\u017edy platn&eacute; a \u010do m&ocirc;\u017ee alebo by malo by\u0165 zmenen&eacute;, pred ot&aacute;zku z&aacute;kladnej vo\u013eby vo viere.<\/p>\n<p>Hlb&scaron;ia a v na&scaron;ej krajine p&aacute;l\u010divej&scaron;ia je druh&aacute; v&yacute;zva, ktor&aacute; stoj&iacute; pred cel&yacute;m kres\u0165anstvom. O tej by som chcel hovori\u0165: ide o kontext sekularizovan&eacute;ho sveta, v ktorom mus&iacute;me \u017ei\u0165 a sved\u010di\u0165 v \u0148om dnes o svojej viere. Nepr&iacute;tomnos\u0165 Boha v na&scaron;ej spolo\u010dnosti dolieha st&aacute;le viac, dejiny jeho zjavenia, o ktorom n&aacute;m hovor&iacute; P&iacute;smo, sa zdaj&uacute; minulos\u0165ou, ktor&aacute; sa st&aacute;le viac vz\u010fa\u013euje. Je teda na mieste ust&uacute;pi\u0165 tlaku sekulariz&aacute;cie, sta\u0165 sa modern&yacute;mi tak, \u017ee vieru rozriedime? Viera prirodzene mus&iacute; by\u0165 znovu premyslen&aacute; a predov&scaron;etk&yacute;m \u017eit&aacute; dnes nov&yacute;m sp&ocirc;sobom, aby sa st&aacute;vala nie\u010d&iacute;m, \u010do patr&iacute; pr&iacute;tomnosti. T&yacute;m, \u010do pom&aacute;ha, v&scaron;ak nie je rozriedenie viery, ale jedine jej pln&eacute; pre\u017e&iacute;vanie v na&scaron;ej s&uacute;\u010dasnosti. To je &uacute;strednou &uacute;lohou ekumenizmu. V tom by sme si mali navz&aacute;jom pom&aacute;ha\u0165, v hlb&scaron;ej a \u017eiv&scaron;ej viere. Taktiky n&aacute;s nezachr&aacute;nia, nezachr&aacute;nia kres\u0165anstvo. To, \u010do n&aacute;s zachr&aacute;ni je znovu premyslen&aacute; a nanovo pre\u017e&iacute;van&aacute; viera, skrze ktor&uacute; Kristus a s n&iacute;m \u017eiv&yacute; Boh vst&uacute;pi do tohto n&aacute;&scaron;ho sveta. Tak ako n&aacute;s mu\u010den&iacute;ci nacistickej epochy priviedli jedn&yacute;ch k druh&yacute;m a vyvolali prv&uacute; ve\u013ek&uacute; ekumenick&uacute; &uacute;stretovos\u0165, tak tie\u017e dnes viera spo\u010d&iacute;vaj&uacute;ca v h\u013abke n&aacute;s sam&yacute;ch, uprostred sekularizovan&eacute;ho sveta, je najsilnej&scaron;ou ekumenickou silou, ktor&aacute; n&aacute;s znovu sp&aacute;ja a vedie n&aacute;s k jednote v jedinom P&aacute;novi.<\/p>\n<p>Zdroj: <a href=\"http:\/\/tkkbs.sk\/view.php?cisloclanku=20110923037\">www.tkkbs.sk<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;Hom&iacute;lia po\u010das ekumenickej bohoslu\u017eby v Erfurte je TU. Pr&iacute;hovor Benedikta XVI. po\u010das stretnutia so z&aacute;stupcami Evanjelickej cirkvi: V&aacute;\u017een&eacute; d&aacute;my, v&aacute;\u017een&iacute; p&aacute;ni! Ke\u010f sa teraz uj&iacute;mam slova, chcel by som predov&scaron;etk&yacute;m po\u010fakova\u0165 za t&uacute;to pr&iacute;le\u017eitos\u0165 stretn&uacute;\u0165 sa s vami. Som v\u010fa\u010dn&yacute; osobitne predstaven&eacute;mu Evanjelickej cirkvi Nikolausovi Schneiderovi, ktor&yacute; ma priv&iacute;tal a svojimi mil&yacute;mi slovami ma prijal &#8230; <a title=\"P\u00e1pe\u017eove pr\u00edhovory v Nemecku\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/2011\/09\/26\/papezove-prihovory-v-nemecku\/\" aria-label=\"Pre\u010d\u00edtajte si viac o P\u00e1pe\u017eove pr\u00edhovory v Nemecku\">\u010c\u00edta\u0165 viac<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[193,2,9,121],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3789","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-co-pisu-ini","category-ekumena","category-europa","category-kazne"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3789","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3789"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3789\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3789"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3789"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.e-anjelik.sk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3789"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}